Re: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM

["Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>]

Hi Long time User  CT

Well  I'm in the same boat with  NA,  The main reason for change is that CT 
and NA  need DOS  to operate correctly .  The   N1MM  software has the 
advantage that it does work in the   XP enviroment and    # 1 it is FREE and 
under continual improvement, and almost any contest that comes along there 
is a program writen for it a month or so ahead.

The N1MM  program will do everything but Tie Your Shoes and I'm not too sure 
it won't do that.

Just a  Quack  Note::

Rex  K7QQ

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Warren Rothberg" <w4wr@bellsouth.net>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 4:31 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] CT vs. N1MM


I have used CT for contesting since I bought my first copy in Dayton in
1987. I have not kept up with developments in the N1MM contest software at
all. So now, 19 years later, I am wondering what the pro’s/con’s of each
package are. Has anyone published a comparison? Is it time to change?



Thanks for your input.



Warren, W4WR



p.s. By the way, my setup is XP SP2 with dual monitors.




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.4/480 - Release Date: 17-Oct-06




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.4/480 - Release Date: 10/17/2006

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest