> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of N6HC@aol.com
> Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 9:36 PM
> To: w5ov@w5ov.com; cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Easy way to correct answer
>
> In a message dated 11/12/06 10:12:28 A.M. Pacific Standard
> Time, w5ov@w5ov.com writes:
>
> So, while I see us on the same side in the battle, I will
> continue to be vocal and speak out against the tyranny.
>
> I wish you god speed. Just be wise enough to pick and choose
> your battles
> carefully. Not all injustice requires calling out the
> militia. I'll be right
> beside you when the battle is crucial.
> Arnie N6HC
That's good, because now that we know that we
cannot take the League's published contest rules
(guidelines? suggestions?) as Gospel without
Contest Desk interpretation, there are many
battles to come...
Hmmm, SS rules don't say you have to send **your**
section as a part of the exchange, just "ARRL/RAC
Section". Maybe I can send "ND" (it's an ARRL
Section!) This is convenient, since I'll be out of
the country for Phone SS. I'll have to ask The Desk.
I'm sure that ARRL will now re-publish SS rule 4.4
to make clear that the check has nothing to do
with the "year first licensed", as that is now their
official stated position. Published rules should be
accurate and complete.
73, Jeff K8ND
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|