CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Partial Exchanges

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Partial Exchanges
From: "Paul O'Kane" <paul@ei5di.com>
Reply-to: "Paul O'Kane" <paul@ei5di.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 07:16:14 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
---- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kelly Taylor" <ve4xt@mb.sympatico.ca>

> To me, 59(9) probably leads the ranks of the most trivial
> of items to protest.

Looks like we'll have to agree to differ on this.

The fact is that you no longer have to send RST in CQWW.
I didn't, I wasn't DQ'd (after all, the software I used
defaulted to 59(9) sent and logged for every QSO) and
that's the way I intend to continue.

In CQWW, and the other major contests, RST is not cross-
checked. Log anything you like and you'll not lose points.
It's an irrelevance.

Those who prefer to send 59(9) in every contest QSO may
continue to do so.  I prefer not to.

73,
Paul EI5DI
---------------------------------------------------------------
    The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
       http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>