CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX SSB: 40m operation

To: <Cqtestk4xs@aol.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX SSB: 40m operation
From: "Mirko Sibilja" <s57ad@amis.net>
Reply-to: Mirko Sibilja <s57ad@amis.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 17:25:45 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Difference is that that (as far as here in EU), CW is allowed over entire
bands. With more and more countries allowed to operate up to 7200 on
secondary basis (S5 since Feb 15, 2006), need to listen deep down into
CW/digital mode subbands becomes obsolete.

73,
Mirko, S57AD

----- Original Message -----
From: <Cqtestk4xs@aol.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 2:13 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX SSB: 40m operation


> In a message dated 3/6/06 1:07:06 AM Greenwich Standard Time,
stwa@hb9ddo.org
> writes:
> While it is very common to expand the phone part of the band slightly
> below 7040 and into the part assigned to digital modes in the large
> contest in my opinion listening as low as 7019 is definitely overdoing
> it. Basically these operators ask us to violate the rules :-(
> We chew this same fat every year.  The band is loaded with CW above 7040
> during CW DX contests, and is loaded with SSB below 7040 during SSB
contests.
> There just is not enough room for all the stations in a contest situation.
The
> SSB guys flex in the CW contests and the CW guys need to flex in SSB
contests.
>
>
> Bill K4XS
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>