CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions

To: Don Field <don.field@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions
From: Gordon LaPoint <n1mgo@arrl.net>
Reply-to: n1mgo@arrl.net
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:55:04 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 10:08, Don Field wrote:

> The question that should be asked, is  WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
> 
> In my case, I write to the entrants concerned  (generally they will have
> submitted electronically, so will have an e-mail address). Further action
> depends very much upon their response. Some  may have genuinely failed to
> register their log as Assisted.  Their entry is modified accordingly. For
> those who don't respond, my action would generally be to reclassify them
> automatically. Only if the same thing happens another year would I consider
> DQ. But this is where the real philosophical question lies, and I would be
> most interested in reactions from reflectorites! Innocent until proven
> guilty (a genuine mistake in their entry) or guilty until proven innocent?
> 
Don,
   I vote for innocent until proven guilty.  We all make mistakes at
times, or at least I do!

-- 
Gordon - N1MGO
n1mgo@arrl.net

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>