On Fri, 2005-12-16 at 10:08, Don Field wrote:
> The question that should be asked, is WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
>
> In my case, I write to the entrants concerned (generally they will have
> submitted electronically, so will have an e-mail address). Further action
> depends very much upon their response. Some may have genuinely failed to
> register their log as Assisted. Their entry is modified accordingly. For
> those who don't respond, my action would generally be to reclassify them
> automatically. Only if the same thing happens another year would I consider
> DQ. But this is where the real philosophical question lies, and I would be
> most interested in reactions from reflectorites! Innocent until proven
> guilty (a genuine mistake in their entry) or guilty until proven innocent?
>
Don,
I vote for innocent until proven guilty. We all make mistakes at
times, or at least I do!
--
Gordon - N1MGO
n1mgo@arrl.net
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|