CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting versus cheerleading

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Self spotting versus cheerleading
From: PD2R <pd2r.maarten@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

Tree-3 wrote:
> 
> 
> I have spoken before about this situation where I was at TI1C in the CQ WW
> contest trying to work weak DLs on 15 meters.  If there was one or two of
> them calling, I could work them.  However, as soon as I got spotted, there
> were 200 of them calling and it was impossible to deal with them.  I would
> QSY up the band and call CQ - and the "normal pattern of activity"
> resulted
> which meant I had one or two of them calling at a time.  This was great 
> until I got spotted again and the pack showed up.  I finally gave up and 
> ran USA stations instead.  Their loss.
> 
> 

Am I missing something here? Stations from a different continent are worth 3
points and US stations 2.
So wouldn't that make it your loss to?

I'm not sure where I stand on this self spotting issue. You could be right
that the number of spots would be overwhelming that nobody benefits from it.
It could level the playing field.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://n2.nabble.com/Self-spotting-versus-cheerleading-tp3909541p3916454.html
Sent from the CQ Contesting (Nabble) mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>