To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | [CQ-Contest] Log Checking. WPX CW. |
From: | brian coyne <g4odv@yahoo.co.uk> |
Date: | Thu, 31 May 2012 11:36:32 +0100 (BST) |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
I got a warning from the Robot of a bad qso. When I look at the line it is just garbage, nothing like a callsign but does have a rcv'd s/n which doesn't look anything like any other qso around that time so, as I just messed up, am I right in assuming. having now submitted the log 'as is', that the other guy will not lose the contact so long as I copied the s/n correctly? What criteria is used for removing the 3 qso penalty, would they be 1 pt or 3 pt qso's and would they involve mult's? 73 Brian C4Z. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Assisted or not assisted question (yet again), Mike & Coreen Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] To cut or not to cut?, Pete Smith N4ZR |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Try 5 bands in NS RTTY Thursday1, Ken Keeler |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Log Checking. WPX CW., brian coyne |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |