CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB

To: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW SSB
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2014 09:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
[sarcasm]


No, Paul, those hams must be punished ("disenfranchised" is  the term from CQ) 
for the sins of the politicians.




[/sarcasm]








73, de Hans, K0HB
"Just a Boy and his Radio"
           7⃣3⃣

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 7:06 AM, Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com> wrote:

> On 19/10/2014 04:27, Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
>> you should stop displaying your ignorance and disrespect of 
>> international and countries regulations and memory of hams who lost 
>> their lives and licenses.
> It's clear that politics and contesting don't mix.
> If the UN cannot settle territorial disputes, we
> can hardly expect the IARU or individual contest
> sponsors to do better.
> There is nothing new, or unique, about such disputes.
> It seems to me that, for contesting purposes, some
> expedience (and neutrality) is called for.
> Whether contesters in Crimea use Russian or Ukranian
> calls makes no difference to the rest of us - unless,
> of course, we're trying to score political points.
> I suggest that, in either case, we assume they are
> licensed by their administration of choice and
> just work and score them accordingly.  Isn't that
> what we've always done?
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>