This is a pretty interesting discussion that from my observation affects over
half of the m/m, m/s, and m2 stations that I know of. In reading the FCC Part
97, it is quite grey as to the interpretation.
"(46) Third-party communications. A message from the control operator (first
party) of an amateur station to another amateur station control operator
(second party) on behalf of another person (third party)."
It doesn't say "radio" it says station. The control operator is controlling
the station at the time. So if the control operator is operating radio 1 and a
general class op is operating radio 2 in the extra class of the band (under the
watchful eye of the control operator) there is consideration that this
general's operation is illegal in some circumatances. But why would the same
radio 2 be considered legal just because this non-control operator happens to
hold an extra class license?
Consider this for a moment: I as an extra class operator am designated by my
friend Dave K1TTT to be control operator of K1TTT during the upcoming ARRL DX
contest. A second operator, also Extra Class joins me and we decide to do M2.
Since the station can only have 1 control operator (me) then all of the second
operator's transmissions are considered third party and therefore potentially
illegal according to the most strict interpretation of the law. Nowhere does
it say that an exception to the third party rule is if the third party is a
duly licensed amateur radio operator operating within his/her class. A third
party, is a third party, licensed or not, extra, general, or tech.
If someone kind find a citation in the Part 97 that says a third party is not a
third party if they are duly licensed and operating within their license class,
I'd love to see it.
Ed N1UR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|