CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Internet Radio Abusers

To: "Doug Renwick" <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Internet Radio Abusers
From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 19:05:22 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Short internet runs (under 20 miles) are OK.




Longer internet runs are Abusive.




Got it.




Somebody needs to call the FCC and tell them to revise  §97.3(a)(39) 
and §97.109(c) to reflect this limitation on remote operations.




__73, de Hans, K0HB

"Just a Boy and His Radio"™

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net> wrote:

> This is how I plan to handle internet radio abusers.  First I should define
> an internet radio abuser.  An operator who uses a remote station beyond say
> a distance of 20 miles from their operating location.  Any station that is
> an internet radio abuser who wishes to receive a QSL card for a contact with
> my station, will be told that they are a NIL.  Why?  I do not consider the
> contact to be legitimate.  And for those who blather on about the rules
> allowing larger distances; the rules do not make it right.
> Doug
> Climate change is natural.  I want climate change.  I want it to be warmer
> where I live.
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>