| To: | w5ov@w5ov.com, xdavid@cis-broadband.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Opinion: SO-unassisted should not be using CW Skimmer |
| From: | k3mm@verizon.net |
| Date: | Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:46:02 -0600 (CST) |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
_______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why passing a piece of paper is not the same as RBN or cluster, Neal Campbell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Inequity of Zone Checking, RT Clay |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Opinion: SO-unassisted should not be using CW Skimmer, Jack Haverty. |
| Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] Country File errata from CQWW 2011 CW, Jim Reisert AD1C |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |