CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] Dupes question

To: "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Dupes question
From: JOHN GEIGER via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: JOHN GEIGER <af5cc1@zohomail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 14:47:22 -0500
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
This question came to me again thru a thread on eham.net but I have thought of 
this question during almost every contest but could never come up with an 
answer.



In the old days we used paper logs with dupe sheets (remember those?).  If you 
left a duplicate QSO in your log, it was removed but you were also penalized 
1-3 additional QSOs, depending on contest.  Now we have computer logging, where 
it immediately tells you if a station is a dupe.  However, you can leave dupe 
QSOs in your log (and are kind of encouraged to) with no penalty.



Now this seems backwards-you were penalized when duping when determining dupes 
took more effort, but you are not penalized when duping is done automatically 
and is obvious to you.



Does someone know the reasoning behind this?



73 John AF5CC


Sent using {0}
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] Dupes question, JOHN GEIGER via CQ-Contest <=