Subject: | [CQ-Contest] WPX debate |
---|---|
From: | trey@kkn.net (Trey Garlough) |
Date: | Fri Apr 17 06:50:39 1998 |
> >3) I'm not so thrilled by the idea of giving 2-points/QSO to W1/W2/W3 > > for working each other on 40/80/160, but hey, it gives people in > > places like North Dakota and the "landlocked states that start with > > the letter I" a reason to live. :-) > > 1 point regardless of band OM. Yeah, I blew it. Thanks to everyone who wrote and pointed this out. Duh! --Trey, N5KO -- CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/ Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [CQ-Contest] WPX, Al Crespo |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] The Great WPX Debate, Ric Painter |
Previous by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] WPX debate, Trey Garlough |
Next by Thread: | [CQ-Contest] WPX debate, Dan Robbins |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |