CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB Sections in SS

To: "Art Boyars" <art.boyars@verizon.net>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SSB Sections in SS
From: "Gerry Hull" <windev@inetmarket.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 20:51:29 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
During CQP, I was mobiling around PEI, and was pretty weak on on 20SSB
at times... I always found "Mike Alpha Radio" worked much better than
"Maritime".
I show up from various stations in SS SSB, and I'll always send with
the section phonetics.

73, Gerry, W1VE (VE1RM, VY2CDX, VO1WIN, etc... )


On 10/18/06, Art Boyars <art.boyars@verizon.net> wrote:
> VO1MX and VE3DZ mentioned that poor enunciation makes it hard to copy your 
> Section -- especially if the receiving op is not familiar with the the info.  
> This brings me back to my Little Pistol question -- on SSB (especially if the 
> signal is weak) which way is easier for the receiving op to copy: 
> "Maaarylaand" or "Mike Delta (Charlie)"; or "Losss Aangeless" or "Lima Alfa 
> Xray"?
>
> I would think that the phonetics are more clear, and that they take one less 
> translation step from ear to keyboard.  But I'd like to hear what the "real" 
> phone op's think.
>
> 73, Art K3KU
> "Tune for maximum fun"
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>