Pete..
I feel that the radio has helped me make weak signal QSOs that I might have
otherwise missed, but
even if it hasn't gained me a single extra QSO, it's gone a long way
towards reducing the stress of operating.
Constantly having to use one's mental filters is very tiring. I feel less
fatigued after operating a contest
with my K3 than I did with my 1000mp or my Pro3 (both with INRAD filter
mods and both very good contest radios).
John, W8FJ...
I have watched with some amazement as the Elecraft K3 has seemingly
taken over the top dog's spot among contest radios, both among the top
ops and the rest of us.
This impels me to wonder, though - how much does improved RX strong
signal performance really improve your ability to score in contests? My
suspicion (showing my going-in bias) is that most of us have long since
developed responses to our receiving problems that tend to minimize the
damage they do. Knowing when to abandon a run frequency, QSYing just a
bit ("skootching"), riding the gain instead of using AGC, all of these
devices have been useful since the dawn of time.
And so the question - how much do serious, full-time, top-ten contesters
feel that improve RX hardware has really improved their scoring ability,
compared to other improvements in their stations over the years?
--
73, Pete N4ZR
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|