CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cluster Practices

To: "'Cq-Contest'" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cluster Practices
From: "w0mu" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 21:01:04 -0600
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 Bill I have to agree, the Can't hear them spots actually helped here too.
I can't recall such odd propagation ever as a ham.  Generally the pacific
from Colorado is like shooting fish in a barrel.  Not so this time.  I can't
recall ever hearing the east coast work the pacific in the afternoon where
we could not hear the station.

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Bill Coleman
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 6:58 PM
To: Alan Zack
Cc: Richard Zalewski; Cq-Contest
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cluster Practices


On Oct 3, 2005, at 12:12 AM, Alan Zack wrote:

> What I really hate is people reporting they DON'T hear the DX!

Actually, I find that useful. During the K7C expedition, I often could not
hear the station at all. I wondered if my rig was broken, or my feedline
disconnected. To realise that other people could not hear either is quite
helpful.

The type of stuff that's completely useless is the comments directed toward
the DX. Do they really think that K7C is spending any time watching the
messages in the packetcluster?

Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL        Mail: aa4lr@arrl.net
Quote: "Not within a thousand years will man ever fly!"
             -- Wilbur Wright, 1901

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>