CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Toughest SS CW sections 2006

To: Kjboasi@aol.com, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Toughest SS CW sections 2006
From: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 20:40:38 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Everyone from SB must have moved to SCV.  I finally
did work SB, but it seemed like 80% of the 6s I worked
were in SCV.  Never remember hearing that many before.

73s John W5TD

--- Kjboasi@aol.com wrote:

> I missed MB, NWT and PAC.  I never heard any NWT
> stations, but heard the 
> other two and couldn't get through.  I had never
> worked a QC station in a previous 
> SS, but this year, I worked 6 of them, which is how
> many stations I worked in 
> my own section (NLI).  Usually there's a lot more
> NLI's and fewer (zero) QC's 
> in the log.  Also worked 2 ND stations, (missed it
> last year), 5 NNY's 
> (usually only 1 or 2 in past years), 2 PR (usually
> only WP3R is there), and 1 each 
> from ORG and SB.  What happened to SB?  Could have
> sworn there were more in 
> previous years.  The biggest surprise was working so
> many NH and VT stations (13 
> and 6 respectively).  Most common sections were VA
> (42 Q's), and MDC, IL, and 
> EPA (33 Q's each).  
> 
> Also, as an aside to previous topics, I worked at
> least one station from each 
> year (check) from 1946-2000 with no gaps.  The
> period 1955-68 had the highest 
> totals.
> 
> 73, Ken, N2ZN
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 




 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>