CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL Ethics question

To: Bob Davis <bob@reconstructinghistory.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] QSL Ethics question
From: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:31:36 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
     This is similar to someone requesting that you QSL with their 
callsign/qrp.  I'm not going to "confirm" something I can't know.

     Maybe offer the guy a sked sometime with his own call sign?


On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:07:33AM -0500, Bob Davis wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Here's a bit of an ethical question: I received a QSL request from a DX op
> who was operating at a club station during CQWW CW. He's asking me to QSL
> his personal callsign for awards use.  Is it "right" to confirm this QSO?
> At first glance, I'm thinking, "No." After all, I have no way of knowing if
> it was truly him at the key. Moreover, I was taught that the only valid
> contact is one in which both callsigns are exchanged in their entirety.
> 
> Is my first-blush reaction the correct one? Or is this sort of thing done
> all the time, and I'm just unaware of the convention?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Bob NQ3X
> 
> http://www.freewebs.com/nq3x
> 
> No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, an
> inconceivably large number of electrons was terribly inconvenienced.
> 
> P.S. Glad to work many of you during the test!  See you in January NAQP.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

-- 
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker@kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>