CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY contesting; filters

To: john@kk9a.com, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY contesting; filters
From: Ed W0YK <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 18:39:49 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Not my experience.   2Tone handles QRM better than the group delay from a 
narrow filter.73,Ed W0YK
-------- Original message --------From: john@kk9a.com Date: 2/17/21  17:37  
(GMT-08:00) To: cq-contest@contesting.com Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RTTY 
contesting; filters I am sure that is true on a quiet band. I wish that I could 
find a 600hzopening anywhere on 20m in last weekend's contest. Any QRM in my 
passbandmakes decoding very difficult.  John KK9A Ed Muns w0yk wrote:An IF 
bandwidth of 600 Hz is ideal with our modern software decoders.(Narrower 
bandwidth introduces phase shift that degrades copy error rate.)Older radios 
often don't allow narrow filtering in SSB mode.  Yes, you wantto shift such 
that the bandpass is centered on whatever tone pair you use.  I do like lower 
tones and typically use 915/1085 which is less fatiguingover long periods.  
OTOH, their TX audio harmonic is still within the normal2 kHz bandwidth for SSB 
transmitters when transmitting AFSK.  Not a problemfor those of us using FSK. 
73,Ed W0YK_______________________________________________CQ-Contest mailing 
listCQ-Contest@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>