CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 260, Issue 13

To: Ron Koenig <k4akkron@gmail.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 260, Issue 13
From: Ed W0YK <ed@w0yk.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 16:34:54 -0700
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
+173,Ed W0YK
-------- Original message --------From: Ron Koenig <k4akkron@gmail.com> Date: 
8/21/24  16:24  (GMT-08:00) To: cq-contest@contesting.com Subject: Re: 
[CQ-Contest] CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 260, Issue 13 Blaming poor operating on an  
Assisted category is absurd. Seriously,  thistopic predates assisted by 50 - 75 
years. Stop looking for a boogeyman whenit's just normal Lids.Ron, WV4POn Wed, 
Aug 21, 2024, 11:32 AM <cq-contest-request@contesting.com> wrote:> Send 
CQ-Contest mailing list submissions to>         cq-contest@contesting.com>> To 
subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit>         
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest> or, via email, send a 
message with subject or body 'help' to>         
cq-contest-request@contesting.com>> You can reach the person managing the list 
at>         cq-contest-owner@contesting.com>> When replying, please edit your 
Subject line so it is more specific> than "Re: Contents of CQ-Contest 
digest...">>> Today's Topics:>>    1. Re: ID in NAQP (K9MA)>>> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------->> 
Message: 1> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 13:56:19 -0500> From: K9MA 
<k9ma@sdellington.us>> To: k9yc@arrl.net> Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com> 
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ID in NAQP> Message-ID: 
<42911603-CA8D-49FA-B60E-57AE60516A4F@sdellington.us>> Content-Type: 
text/plain; charset=utf-8>> Because the assisted category was recently added to 
NAQP, possibly leading> some operators to assume their callers would just get 
their calls from> spots.>> 73,> Scott K9MA> ---------->> Scott Ellington>>  --- 
via iPad>> > On Aug 20, 2024, at 7:13?AM, Jim Brown 
<k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>> wrote:> >> > ?On 8/19/2024 1:43 PM, Jeff Clarke 
wrote:> >> Why single out NAQP only now?> >> > Because NAQP was established 
many years ago as a low power, unassisted> contest, which established its 
character. Most of us liked it that way --> Rules favored the little guns. Now, 
we see it becoming just like any other> contest, with  Rules favoring the best 
stations, and the worst of them> abusing good operating practice. Spotting HAS, 
sadly, changed the nature of> this contest, and not for the better.> >> > 73, 
Jim K9YC> >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________> > 
CQ-Contest mailing list> > CQ-Contest@contesting.com> > 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>>>> 
------------------------------>> Subject: Digest Footer>> 
_______________________________________________> CQ-Contest mailing list> 
CQ-Contest@contesting.com> 
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>>> 
------------------------------>> End of CQ-Contest Digest, Vol 260, Issue 13> 
*******************************************>_______________________________________________CQ-Contest
 mailing 
listCQ-Contest@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>