CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?

To: reflector cq-contest <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?
From: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 14:08:28 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Anyone remember the Gridloc contest?

Tor
N4OGW

--- On Sat, 12/12/09, Ahokas Kari <kari.ahokas@turku.fi> wrote:

> From: Ahokas Kari <kari.ahokas@turku.fi>
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is it time to reevaluate CQWW Scoring Rules?
> To: "reflector cq-contest" <CQ-Contest@Contesting.COM>
> Date: Saturday, December 12, 2009, 2:58 PM
> It would be quite simple (I think) to
> calculate points according to the length of a qso (that has
> been done for ages in 2-meter  contests). Whether a qso
> is short or long path is irrelevant here, LP qsos are a
> minority anyway.... 
> 
> You wouldn't even need to exchange the grid info (very
> complex, would take all the fun of running a pile up) , all
> calculations could be made after the contest, based on the
> grid info sent by the ops.... 
> 
> Who would win would be a thrill up to the last minute
> before the final scores are published...
> 
> 
> Kari OH3RB
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>