I agree 100% with Hans. I see nothing at all "nasty".
Could it be one station was just a bit louder than the others?
If you were to do this 100%, there would be claims of fist recognition..
73- Chuck KI9A
In a message dated 7/11/2010 11:58:13 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
kzerohb@gmail.com writes:
>
> Take a look at the Top 20 spotters analysis at:
> http://www.5bits.net/lu5dx/2010-wrtc-spots-analysis/
>
> Martin, LU5DX
> www.5bits.net/lu5dx
>
Martin,
I went to your site, and the analysis doesn't suggest "nasty" to me.
At this moment R36F is spotted 21 times more than the next competitor (the
range of numbers for the "pack" right now runs from the mid 40's with a
fairly even distribution up to 121 spots).
I don't know who R36F is, and examining the spotters on your "raw" list, I
don't see any pattern different to other random "spottees" that I perused.
So what is the "nasty"?
73, de Hans, K0HB
--
"Just a boy and his radio"
--
Proud Member of:
A1 Operators - http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
MWA - http://www.W0AA.org
TCDXA - http://www.tcdxa.org
CADXA - http://www.cadxa.org
LVDXA - http://www.lvdxa.org
CWOps - http://www.cwops.org
SOC - http://www.qsl.net/soc
TCFMC - http://tcfmc.org
--
Sea stories here ---> http://k0hb.spaces.live.com/
Request QSL at ---> http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
All valid QSL requests honored with old fashioned paper QSL!
LoTW participant
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|