48 hours? No, not in favor of that. There are enough 48 hour marathons.
73 Rich NN3W
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stan" <ua1out@yahoo.com>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 5:31 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Russian DX Contest analysis available
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday, contest rate analyser was given access to rdxc.org logs
> storage. It just finished parsing RDXC logs and results are now available
> here:
>
> http://www.ei6dx.com/cqww-contest-analysis/cqww-activity-analyzer/
>
> They show some interesting trends.
>
> Clearly RDXC is gaining a lot of popularity and it is now one of the top 3
> WW contests. For example, combined CW and SSB rates of RDXC are higher
> than those of CQWPX CW for same hours in 2010. This means that bands are
> livelier during RDXC hours. If we consider European activity we see that
> European RDXC CW rates are higher than those of CQWPX CW for the same
> period particularly on low bands, which is pretty amazing. Asiatic
> activity in CW is higher by a considerable margin and is almost as high as
> in some of the CQWW CW tests (2007 for example). Despite the fact that
> North American activity is a lot lower in RDXC, I think it is time for
> RDXC committee to consider a 48 hour event.
>
> I would like to thank Harry RA3AUU and Vlad RW1AC for providing temporary
> access to remote repositories and for allowing the results to be
> published.
>
> vy 73 de Stan
> www.ei6dx.com
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|