George's example gets to the root of the issue. Its not whether the
station is a home station or guest operation, its WHETHER THE
SINGLE-OPERATOR GETS ASSISTANCE which makes the difference.
Fat chance getting the contesting community to get behind this concept...
Dave
At 05:03 AM 1/22/03 -0800, George Fremin III - K5TR wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 01:35:46AM -0600, K4RO Kirk Pickering wrote:
> > I'm all for it Tom. Interestingly, a similar discussion
> > just broke out on the TCG reflector. Specifically, that
> > a serious guest op who has someone help him (e.g. fix an
> > antenna) DURING the contest has a significant advantage over
> > the op who must do it himself. The advantage is as much mental
> > as technical or physical. I would have given my eyeteeth to
> > have someone help me when everything broke here during CW SS.
> > But I'm not sure I would have felt like a single op if I did.
> > I also agree that a separate catrgory is unnecessary. Maybe
> > just a marker, like there used to be for LP & QRP in the Sprints.
> >
>
>mmmmm..... I was what most would describe as a "guest op"
>when I operated from the W5KFT station. Whenever I did a
>single op contest I was the only person there - indeed
>the station owner was 300+ miles away. There was no pit crew.
>But this was also not the station at my house.
>
>There was no one to bring me food or water or anything else.
>
>So I fail to see how you can define this division of catagories
>into anything that makes sense.
>
>--
>George Fremin III - K5TR
>geoiii@kkn.net
>http://www.kkn.net/~k5tr
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
> The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland!
> THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS!
> http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|