To: | Bob Wanderer <aa0cy@QUADNET.NET> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange |
From: | John Laney <k4bai@worldnet.att.net> |
Date: | Mon, 10 May 2004 10:44:53 -0400 |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
KE1FO says explaining an unusual contest exchange is easy, but he must
be talking about on SSB. It is very difficult on CW. Even some
otherwise good CW operators can't seem to copy anything but callsigns
and the expected exchange on CW. The casual operator can't be expected
to understand the explanation on CW and it would take forever to get the
info across. Also, before we go changing the exchange so that the sent information varies with each QSO (other than signal report information), I'd want some assurance from contest logging programmers that our existing logging programs can easily accomplish that. I don't know how they could, but guess TR must be able to do so in view of the Internet contest rotating exchanges. I don't think that is possible with NA and CT. 73, John, K4BAI. _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
Previous by Date: | Fw: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange, Rex Maner |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2004 Rus DX - All Final Claimed Scores, mwdink |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange, Bob Wanderer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange, Paul O'Kane |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |