CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Internet Radio Abusers

To: Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Internet Radio Abusers
From: "ScottW3TX@verizon.net" <scottw3tx@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 23:05:10 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Why not 1000ft, or 5 miles, or 10 miles or 63 miles?

Best regards,
Scott

On Nov 5, 2015, at 7:34 PM, Doug Renwick <ve5ra@sasktel.net> wrote:

This is how I plan to handle internet radio abusers.  First I should define
an internet radio abuser.  An operator who uses a remote station beyond say
a distance of 20 miles from their operating location.  Any station that is
an internet radio abuser who wishes to receive a QSL card for a contact with
my station, will be told that they are a NIL.  Why?  I do not consider the
contact to be legitimate.  And for those who blather on about the rules
allowing larger distances; the rules do not make it right.
Doug

Climate change is natural.  I want climate change.  I want it to be warmer
where I live.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>