The 3 stations did not sent in a log, so the checking robot has no way
to validate the sent report.
As they never know what the stations sent these qso's were valid.
Same error was made some years ago in the IARU REG1 VHF contests, were
the log checkers validated callsigns against a know qth-locator database
for stations that did not sent in a log.
Wrong decision of the checkers.
Henk
Jorge Diez - CX6VM schreef:
> Hello,
>
> I was Reading the CX1AA 2009 IARU log checking report.
>
> Take my attention this ones that were removed:
>
> EXCHANGE CHECK RESULTS
> ----------------------
>
> 20CW CP4BT : 14 should be 12
>
> CP has ITU 12 and 14. I don´t have the QSL here to check the ITU zone of
> CP4BT, but if it´s 14, why it has been removed?
>
> 15CW PY7OJ : 11 should be 13
> 160CW PY3PR : 11 should be 15
>
> In this case, what happens if this PY guys are just doing casual radio and
> don´t know the rules. They think they must send CQ zone instead of ITU zone.
> So I put in my log 599 11 that is what I received. If PY7OJ send his log I
> think he send a log where he send in all cases 599 11.
>
> So why it´s removed? So you musnt't write what you received? And you must
> write in your log what must be the correct?
>
> This will not be a difference in our score or position, but will be good to
> know from IARU the instructions on what we must log, if what we received or
> what must be the correct exchange report.
>
> 73,
> Jorge
> CX6VM/CW5W
>
>
--
Henk Remijn PA5KT
email: pa5kt@remijn.net
www: www.remijn.net
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|