CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspotting, and its

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspotting, and its impact
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:52:55 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
With this thinking,

That means prior to the 80's there would have been no contesting?  
Because there is no spotting?

Joe WB9SBD
On 7/15/2010 10:53 AM, kd4d@comcast.net wrote:
> Good day, Kelly and everyone:
>
> I am concerned about the potential effect of a suggestion "to request the DX
> Cluster operators to kindly employ WRTC filters" on the vast majority of
> participants in the IARU contest.  Relatively few of the callsigns in my IARU
> log are from serious competitors - most are from operators who get on to 
> increase
> country totals, give out a few points, work WRTC competitors, etc..
>
> I think we need to consider the casual operators when discussing proposals 
> like
> disabling the packet cluster system or filtering out WRTC calls.  Without 
> them,
> contesting would wither away...
>
> 73,
>
> Mark, KD4D
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kelly Taylor"<theroadtrip@mts.net>
> To: "Paul O'Kane"<pokane@ei5di.com>, CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:39:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations / Results /Overspotting, and  
> its impact
>
> [...]
>
> Is it not possible, just thinking out loud here, to request the DX Cluster
> operators to kindly employ WRTC filters for the course of IARU?
>
> [...]
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>    
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>