CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Consider This Fellow Contesters

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Consider This Fellow Contesters
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:17:44 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I agree John,

One real easy rule of thumb that seems to work well on lists like these. 
is simple.

Before hitting send think to yourself,

Would I say this  directly to the face of the person if they were 
standing 2 feet away from me and say it to them directly.

If you wouldn't do that,,, then don't do it here either.

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 7/22/2010 11:24 AM, K1AR@aol.com wrote:
>
>
> All,
>
> Over the past few  weeks in particular, there has been a significant
> increase in personal attacks  and mudslinging on this channel. Someone aptly
> pointed out recently that rather  than celebrating the enormous 
> accomplishments
> at WRTC-2010, we spent more  time complaining about the impact of packet
> spotting-related issues. It's no  wonder that the majority of actual 
> competitors
> have  avoided posting celebratory summaries of their experiences. Someone
> might  chew them out for their airline selection between London and New  York
> or the fact that they used the Internet to catch up  on email during the
> flight. Or, they might simply be thinking, "Why bother with  this crowd?" That
> is a huge loss for us all.
>
>
>
> I'd like to again ask  for some balance. My broader concern has more to do
> with the perception about  contesting that is created by the subtle (and
> sometimes not so subtle) bickering  that takes place here. In many cases, I'm
> not proud of the image we're creating  for new or potential contesters.
> Frankly, we often spend more time bitching than  contributing useful insight 
> that
> benefits contesting at  large.
>
>
>
> While Tom and I try  our best to allow for an open forum, this is a
> moderated list. I'd simply like  to ask, via this message, that you think 
> twice
> before launching your next  "nastygram." In an ideal world, the archived
> version of CQ-Contest should be  great fodder for the advancement of 
> contesting
> and new contester recruitment. As  it currently exists, we have a long way to
> go.
>
>
>
> Think about it and  thanks for reading.
>
>
>
> 73 John,  K1AR
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>    
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>