Au contraire, Dave. You have completely "gotten it." Your single
paragraph should explain to everyone why there is no further need for
this discussion.
73, Pete N4ZR
The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at
reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000
On 7/28/2010 10:21 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
>
> But technology doesn't do everything for you unless you choose for it to
> do so. You are free to operate however you wish, competing only against
> others who operate as you do while taking advantage of available
> contacts from everyone. You can't claim that anyone using additional
> technology ruins anything for you during the contest because you can't
> even tell that they are doing so, and it doesn't ruin anything for you
> after the contest because they compete in a different category than you do.
>
> I still don't get it.
>
> Dave AB7E
>
>
>
>
> On 7/28/2010 3:34 PM, John Geiger wrote:
>
>> I just don't like the fact that contesting had gotten to the point where
>> technology does everything. Now you don't even have to copy CW or tune the
>> band, the computer will do it all for you. I would guess that sooner or
>> later "unassisted" will allow for it.
>>
>> 73s John AA5JG
>>
>> --- On Wed, 7/28/10, David Gilbert<xdavid@cis-broadband.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> From: David Gilbert<xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The King (Packet cluster network) is dead! Long
>> live the King
>> To: "John Geiger"<aa5jg@yahoo.com>, cq-contest@contesting.com
>> Date: Wednesday, July 28, 2010, 4:34 PM
>>
>>
>>
>> Why is that? Why would you care how anyone finds you?
>>
>> How will you even be able to tell whether anyone finds you via spinning a
>> knob or via CW Skimmer? If anything, Skimmer spots are more evenly
>> distributed in time compared with current packet/cluster spots that tend to
>> result in congregated callers.
>>
>> Are you worried about having to compete against folks using Skimmer? If so,
>> simply operate unassisted.
>>
>> I don't get it ... what am I missing?
>>
>> 73,
>> Dave AB7E
>>
>>
>> On 7/28/2010 6:49 AM, John Geiger wrote:
>>
>> Right now I just "tolerate" SSB contesting, but skimmer might lead me to
>> become mainly a SSB contester.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|