CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 13:33:59 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
And if I decide to visually decode CW off a good waterfall display, I'm 
pretty certain that would meet anyone's definition of unassisted 
operation as well.

Dave   AB7E



On 1/4/2011 5:42 AM, David Robbins wrote:
> inadequate and not politically correct... you need a better definition that 
> accounts for those who are either physically or mentally unable to copy by 
> ear, or by eye, or by typing what they can see or hear.
>
>
> Jan 3, 2011 09:06:57 PM, w4pa@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> W5OV:
>
>> The focus instead should be "what are the characteristics of an unassisted
>> single op"?
> Ear, not eye.
>
> Scott
> W4PA
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>