CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Is QSL Bureau pertinent in today HAM Radio
From: Joe <nss@mwt.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 07:43:15 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I Voted, and it looks lie i m in the majority also.

I'd love to see it opened to stateside QSL's also.  he cost of sending 
them now is far more costly than what DX cards cost to send when the 
buro was made.

As they say the infrastructure is already there.

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 3/27/2012 9:39 PM, Yannick (XV4Y) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is bit out of topic but contesters opinion is highly valuable.
> Following a discussion on DX-World.net about the next Intrepid-DX group QSL 
> policy I started a small poll about QSL in the 21th century in general.
> Please share your opinion.
> http://www.qslwatch.com/poll-about-qsl-bureau/
>
> Thanks.
> 73,
> Yan.
> ---
> Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
> http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/
> http://varc.radioclub.asia/
> http://www.qslwatch.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>