Would this discussion have been any different if we had remembered this?
http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter?issue=2005-04-22
Or were aware of this?
http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=2615849
And this?
http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=2788386
What's your call? Or should we ask, what's your surname?
http://www.qrz.co.il/home.php?page=W2/UR5DEM
And though not the same, a somewhat similar situation in the past
concerning the station used:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/alt.radio.scanner.flame_fest/FHld-yZ9Jec
That last one I can't find the original on arrl.org, so we might wonder
if it is really from ARRL. I have in the past found something like
this, where you can't find the original but because of the "parrot"
nature of amateur radio "news", it still exists elsewhere. So I suspect
it's legit.
Finally, a radiosporting CV of sorts:
http://qsl.net/kc2llm/contesting.html
Putting this all together, I wouldn't be very pleased if I were near or
in the same category as this guy over the years. Could this be an
example of what I mentioned in a previous post, about what could happen
if left unchecked & later the participant breaches the threshold of
scrutiny?
73, ex-VR2BG/p.
PS: The keen reader might Google the given & two surnames from his
current K amateur licenses.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|