CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL CW 2012

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] KP2MM Disqualified in ARRL CW 2012
From: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>
Reply-to: vr2bg@harts.org.hk
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:19:42 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Would this discussion have been any different if we had remembered this?

http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter?issue=2005-04-22

Or were aware of this?

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=2615849

And this?

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsSearch/license.jsp?licKey=2788386

What's your call?  Or should we ask, what's your surname?

http://www.qrz.co.il/home.php?page=W2/UR5DEM

And though not the same, a somewhat similar situation in the past 
concerning the station used:

https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/alt.radio.scanner.flame_fest/FHld-yZ9Jec

That last one I can't find the original on arrl.org, so we might wonder 
if it is really from ARRL.  I have in the past found something like 
this, where you can't find the original but because of the "parrot" 
nature of amateur radio "news", it still exists elsewhere.  So I suspect 
it's legit.

Finally, a radiosporting CV of sorts:

http://qsl.net/kc2llm/contesting.html

Putting this all together, I wouldn't be very pleased if I were near or 
in the same category as this guy over the years.  Could this be an 
example of what I mentioned in a previous post, about what could happen 
if left unchecked & later the participant breaches the threshold of 
scrutiny?

73, ex-VR2BG/p.

PS: The keen reader might Google the given & two surnames from his 
current K amateur licenses.

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>