On 8/23/2012 9:14 AM, Michael Adams wrote:
>
> I would argue that "the best" qualification scoring system would be the one
> that does the best job at predicting WRTC results. With a body of
> publicly available data, different qualification schemes could be developed
> and tested against one another. It becomes a simple predictive modeling
> exercise, really.
>
> I suspect that, at least among "reasonable" possible scoring systems, the
> list of qualifying entrants would be pretty similar.
>
>
Without commenting on the abilities of any operators, I'll note that a
team of operators from WRTC 2010 who operates exclusively in the LP
category did not finish in the Top Ten of all teams.
73 Rich NN3W
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|