I wonder how much use is being made of the "signature" technique
developed a few years ago by VE5ZX and CT1BOH. While it falls short of
the absolute standard that might be required in court, it offers a
pretty clear way of identifying likely cheaters of this kind, yet I have
seen no reference to it at all in the years since. Now that we have
logs available for all CQWW participants, it would seem trivial to test
each of the claimed unassisted logs against this standard.
73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
On 11/30/2012 7:44 AM, Ken Claerbout wrote:
Set #1) Those who use and enjoy skimmers, clusters, and other
technology which alerts them to QSO targets. May they continue to
thrive and encourage new people to explore radiosport.
Set #2) Those who enjoy detecting and chasing down QSO targets "in
the wild". May they thrive and encourage new people to explore
radiosport. May they also be free from competing in the same category
as set #1.
And may those in #2 be free from those who use #1 but claim #2. Just a
dream I occasionally have.
Ken K4ZW
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|