On a positive note, skimmer is NOT posting that very prolific 2x0
callsign from the Ivory Coast - TU.
Probably not necessary as station TU signs that callsign almost every
QSO. Once in a while, he signs a different callsign, so there must be
more than one op there :-)
Barry W2UP
On 2/20/2013 11:33, Tim Duffy wrote:
K3LR is not using full break-in on any band. There is no distortion detected
on the TX RF scope pattern. Amplifier vacuum relays are pulled in before any
TX RF is applied by using the Win-Test PTT option.
We'll try the extra half space option between K3LR's in November.
If this works, lots of guys will be disappointed that they will miss the
rare EK3 multiplier during CQWW CW 2013.
73,
Tim K3LR
-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Marijan Miletic, S56A
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:50 AM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Summarizing the Skimmer Accuracy Thread
I guess Bob argument is biased on EK3LR events. There are less than 100
wrong spots from USA Skimmers. One would also expect similar EK9CT errors
but there are only 5. No EK1ZZ or EK9NW. Only 16 errors of EW3LPL. Only
one EU Skimmer G0KTN made EK3LR single error out of 330 proper spots.
Average human error rate on CW is around 3 %. Not for Z6/S56A!
I suspect K3LR is using full break-in at legal power which distorts CW
envelope causing random timing errors. We can learn a lot from RBN!
LP MMM S56A
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|