CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Two points for intra-NA QSOs in CQWW?
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 11:50:04 -0700
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>

Yes ... for certain there is now little about any of us that is not publicly available somewhere on the internet. A couple of years ago Ron posted an argument against (if I remember correctly) some digital contest because the information transmitted could so easily be aggregated and made public. So I did an internet search for "W3WN" and found an incredible amount of information about Ron mined mostly from the roughly 4,500 posts he had made himself to various public forums. It included family info, various public and private disputes, associations outside of ham radio ... even some legal stuff.

A contest log would seem to be among the least of our concerns ...

73,
Dave   AB7E



On 3/10/2013 8:35 AM, Steve London wrote:
Ron,

IIRC, the primary reason you stopped submitting logs is because you objected to the logs becoming "public", viewable by anyone.

Well, you can start submitting logs again, because despite your best effort, your log is public, anyway. See http://rate.pileup.ru/vlog.php?call=W3WN .

73,
Steve, N2IC

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>