Mike, what is amazing is that 3455 logs have been received for the 2013
RDXC, held just a few weeks ago. If you haven't heard of it, you have
been following in the footsteps of Rip Van Winkle.
73,
Steve, N2IC
On 04/01/2013 09:39 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
So RDXC and CQWW are on the same level? Apparently we can now draw
definite conclusions by comparing one of the best "attended" with a
contest that many people have never heard of. Amazing.
Mike W0MU
On 4/1/2013 2:51 PM, Steve London wrote:
Thanks for the data, Chris.
In the 24 hour RDXC, 9% operate full time (>23 hours).
In the 48 hour CQWW SSB (using KR2Q data), 11.9% operate 24 hours or
more.
So, presented with a shorter contest, the percentage who choose to
operate full time is actually less than the percentage who operate 24
or more hours in a 48 hour contest.
I fail to see how adding a 24 hour category to a 48 hour contest will
encourage more people to operate even 24 hours.
73,
Steve, N2IC
On 04/01/2013 01:19 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
N2IC wrote: How about looking at the statistics for those major
worldwide
contests that are already 24 hours long, such as the IARU HF, and
Russian DX
? What percentage of participants currently operate more than, say 22
hours
? I'm sure there is a reader of this list has access to that data.
Are the
"24 hour category" folks walking their talk ?
------------------------------------
Hi Steve,
in four RDXCs 11 to 15 percent of the SOAB operated 20 to 24 hours
with up
to 9 percent having 23:xx hours.
See http://www.dl8mbs.de/40984/45289.html
73, Chris (DL8MBS)
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|