CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Ethics of operating overtime in SS

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Ethics of operating overtime in SS
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 16:52:35 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The rules are pretty clear. Apparently what they are doing wit the logs is contrary to the rules. Maybe the rules should be more clearly written. Why have rules that you don't enforce?

It is pretty clear that the rules say to operate 24 of the 30. They do not say if you operate more than 24 hours your score will be determined by the first 24 hours of operation.

So what is it ARRL?

Mike W0MU

On 10/28/2013 2:24 PM, Ed Muns wrote:
It may be against your interpretation of the rules but it is how the ARRL
handles the logs.

Ed W0YK


Kelly VE4XT wrote:

That might work for WW with a 'classic' overlay, but it's against the rules
in SS. They specifically say off time is 'without operating.'

2.4. All entries may operate no more than 24 of the 30 hours.
2.5. Off periods may not be less than 30 minutes in length.
2.6. Times off and on must be clearly noted in paper logs. In
electronically-submitted Cabrillo logs, off-times are calculated by the
log-checking software.
2.7. Listening time counts as operating time.

When your 24 hours are up, they're up. The rule was designed that way to
prevent operators from working the entire contest and only claiming credit
for the best 24.

There's no provision for operating more than 24 hours and only claiming 24
hours, nor is there a provision for leaving the receiver on so as not to
miss a band opening.

Which doesn't mean you cannot start a separate entry by operating at a
different location under a different call sign and starting at zero QSOs and
zero mults.

73, kelly
ve4xt




On 10/28/13 12:44 PM, "Ed Muns" <w0yk@msn.com> wrote:

Please don't submit two logs under the same callsign, each from a
different
part of the contest period.  The most recent submitted log will replace
all
prior logs.

Instead, include all QSOs in one log and let the log check software score
the first 24 hours.  No one is penalized for operating beyond a time
limit.
The additional QSOs are not counted in your score, but they are needed to
verify the other logs.  Any QSO left out will cause a NIL in the other
log.
Ed W0YK



Hans K0HB wrote:

Submit a log for the first 24 hours; then a second check log for the
remaining Q's.  Who would fault the ethics of that?

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>