Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending Call getting worse?

[Joe <nss@mwt.net>]

And even us guys that have no chance of winning, but follow the rules.. 
does matter to us.
Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 11/27/2013 3:38 PM, Cqtestk4xs@aol.com wrote:
> Without some sort of penalty why not guess and/or make up  "uniques".  Only
> the Qs that they don't like are the ones you lose.  I  don't know if the
> prior or subsequent QSO should be lost, but there needs to be  some kind of
> penalty for busted Qs.  No penalty is so 2000s.
>   
> For the serious guys it DOES matter.
>   
> Bill K4XS
>   
>   
> In a message dated 11/27/2013 5:01:28 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
> kzerohb@gmail.com writes:
>
> Joe, I  think you're taking this game a little too seriously.
>
> Screw up a QSO,  you lose that QSO, but punishment in the form of
> additional
> score  reduction is so 1940's.
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> --
> "Just a boy and his  radio"™
> --
>
>
>
> > I would like to see the QSO's before and  after also be  removed.
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest  mailing  list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing  list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest