To: | CQ-Contest@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 1966 vs 2006 [was: Why did the Canadians (PT5M)beat the Ame... |
From: | PaulKB8N@aol.com |
Date: | Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:18:33 EDT |
List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
In a message dated 8/21/2006 4:13:20 P.M. Central Standard Time, n4zr@contesting.com writes: Given the state-of-the-art in 2006 (and >the ability of modern transceivers to dig out weaker >signals), I would wonder if the number is closer to >5-dB or more before "another layer" is revealed due >simply to technical issues and not operator skill My impression of modern transceivers is not altogether good. My stock Drake R-4B never had any trace of intermod or overload problems that many "modern" transceivers have, and it was plenty sensitive, too. Paul, K5AF _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] 1966 vs 2006 [was: Why did the Canadians (PT5M)beat the Americans...], Pete Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C) in WR..., Jimk8mr |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C)in WRTC, rt_clay |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Why did the Canadians (PT5M) beat the Americans(PW5C) in WR..., Jimk8mr |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |