It's a question of pragmatism. That is, when the operations are sight
unseen (unlike WRTC and HST), there's a limit to what can be enforced
and what can't.
On a side note, there was a DQ from HST a number of years ago when I
competitor from Belarus was found to have a CW "slower downer" built
into his headphones. After that, the rules were changed - headphones
supplied by the organizers.
Barry W2UP
On 5/24/2015 14:48, Stan Stockton wrote:
No, Barry. It's drawing a line to preserve some semblance of skill required to
work a CW Contest. Using your thinking, I see no reason to disallow CW Readers
in High Speed CW Competitions.
Stan, K5GO
Sent from Stan's IPhone
On May 24, 2015, at 1:08 PM, Barry <w2up@comcast.net> wrote:
I believe the likelihood of this is up there with the argument to preserve
paper logs and dupe sheets. Time and technology continue, and we adapt to the
changes.
Barry W2UP
On 5/24/2015 10:59, Stan Stockton wrote:
If nothing else good comes of the TO7A operation, perhaps a renewed interest to
preserve SOAB instead of eliminating it will be the result. That's a good thing.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|