CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2

To: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Changes for the CQ WW WPX SSB and CW Contests in 2021
From: dimitri <cosson-dimitri@bbox.fr>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 21:06:03 +0100
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Tor,

Where is the problem ? Check the score database and you'll see that SO 
unassisted scores are higher than assisted most of the time so...

73 de Dimitri F4DSK


⁣Télécharger BlueMail pour Android ​

Le 16 nov. 2020 à 20:49, à 20:49, RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net> a écrit:
>>*    It is becoming increasingly more difficult to draw the line
>between
>>assisted and unassisted operations as SDR technologies become more
>>integrated with contest software / networks
>As someone who develops logging/SDR software for unassisted use,  this
>statement is false and a bad excuse for the decision to eliminate
>single op. It is very easy to distinguish: if the software can give the
>operator a list of calls and frequencies then it belongs in assisted.
>Sorry, it looks like no more CQ WPX CW for me.
>
>Tor N4OGW
> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>  
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>