Ed:
"SO2R in a box" was a reality 15 years ago when Yaesu introduced the FT-1000D.
The FT-1000D had Dual "Out of Band Receive" which allowed listen on, say both
80M
and 20M at the SAME time. The FT-1000 did not have this feature unless you added
the optional BP-1 filter.
When Yaesu introduced the FT-1000MP series they made it into a Dual "In Band
Receive"
radio which meant you could tune the Main and Sub receiver to different
frequencies,
but they had to be in the SAME band. A big step backwards IMHO.
Now that Yaesu has introduced the FT-9000 Series radios, they brought back the
Dual
"Out of Band Receive" capability on at least one in the series. I don't know if
the
other FT-9000 models can be converted to Dual "Out of Band Receive" as easily
as the
FT-1000.
All I know is that in another 10 years we are going to pay more $$$ for
whatever we buy !!!
73
Bob, K1VU
At 12:59 2/1/2007, sawyered@earthlink.net wrote:
>While I believe that technically, internet based remote contesting might be
>achievable (seems like delays are an inhibiter right now), I am predicting
>that the practice would regulated out by the Contest Committees.
>
>I think that the digital embedding of callsign information in our signals may
>be another frontier that will be available, kicking off another round
>"assisted vs. unassisted" debate.
>
>SO2R "in a box" is no doubt on the horizon.
>
>I think some other innovative multi-band antennas will be here.
>
>"real time scoreboards" are already here, the question of whether they are
>adopted is another issue.
>
>I would love to see the output Tonno. Good Luck.
>
>73
>
>Ed N1UR
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|