If the unscrupulous person was a single op (not assisted) he would have to
be doubly unscrupulous to have an open packet/internet connection available
to spot the guy.
If the person was assisted (single op or multi) it would be a sign of
scrupulousness that he wanted to verify the callsign from the sending station,
not from third party spotting information.
73 - Jim K8MR
In a message dated 12/1/2010 7:23:06 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
kq2m@earthlink.net writes:
Only an unscrupulous person would even suggest such a
shameful thing! I can't believe that you actually posted this.
Two wrongs don't make a right, no matter what the
perceived "offense".
Bob KQ2M
An unscrupulous person (not me!) might discourage this by
intentionally spotting non-IDer's calls incorrectly by a dit or
two. Such as BY5A instead of 6Y5A, or ER8A instead of EF8A, etc. :-)
Let the non-IDers beware!
73, Bill W4ZV
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|