CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Exchange Inconsistencies & Integrity

To: "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Exchange Inconsistencies & Integrity
From: "Alfred Frugoli" <alfred.frugoli@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:18:59 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Eric Hilding <b38@hilding.com> wrote:

>
> H, L & Q also conform to the rules categories and can minimize exchange
> errors.  What could be simpler than this?
>

I thought the purpose of contests was to enhance operator skill, not dumb
down the exchange so anybody can get it right.

Besides, as has been stated before, if you want a contest with a
straightforward easy to copy exchange, participate in CQWW.

73 de Al, KE1FO
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>