To: | "Eric Hilding" <b38@hilding.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Exchange Inconsistencies & Integrity |
From: | "Alfred Frugoli" <alfred.frugoli@gmail.com> |
Date: | Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:18:59 -0400 |
List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Eric Hilding <b38@hilding.com> wrote: > > H, L & Q also conform to the rules categories and can minimize exchange > errors. What could be simpler than this? > I thought the purpose of contests was to enhance operator skill, not dumb down the exchange so anybody can get it right. Besides, as has been stated before, if you want a contest with a straightforward easy to copy exchange, participate in CQWW. 73 de Al, KE1FO _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer for Propagation Analysis, David Gilbert |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [CQ-Contest] 2008 NA Sprint RTTY - March - 3830 Claimed Scores 09Mar2008, mwdink |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Exchange Inconsistencies & Integrity, W0MU Mike Fatchett |
Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Exchange Inconsistencies & Integrity, VR2BrettGraham |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |