| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R |
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
| Date: | Thu, 10 Aug 2017 11:34:55 -0700 |
| List-post: | <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On 8/10/2017 8:05 AM, Mike Ritz wrote: While you don't necessarily need separate categories for SO2R verses SO1R From where I sit (NorCal) LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION, and ANTENNAS, ANTENNAS, ANTENNAS matter a LOT more than SO1R or SO2R. And a lot of that comes down to MONEY, MONEY, MONEY. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R, Mike Ritz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R, Henning |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R, Mike Ritz |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] SO2R vs SO1R, Henning |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |