CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get?

To: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>, <tom@n1mm.com>, "'CQ-Contest'" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get?
From: "Rex Maner" <k7qq@netzero.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:51:30 -1200
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Maybe I could put the Amp in the barn out by the tower then it would be out 
of sight if someone came by, or do as W6VSS did and put it in a barrel 
buried in the lawn. (OH he got caught that time)

Q

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Widelitz" <widelitz@gte.net>
To: <tom@n1mm.com>; "'CQ-Contest'" <CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] How blatant can you get?


> Tom, N1NN, wrote
>
> "But there is no reason a rule couldn't be drafted to outlaw amps capable 
> of
> much more than legal power being present during the contest or even at any
> period of time prior to the contest.  Proving that a large amp is/was
> present is easier than showing that it is being used to produce illegal
> power"
>
> Excellent point. Excellent suggestion. Easy to implement the rule. Still
> hard to enforce, as power cheaters would just ban cameras in the shack:)
>
>
> 73, Ken, K6LA / VY2TT
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

____________________________________________________________
Penny Stock Jumping 3000%
Sign up to the #1 voted penny stock newsletter for free today!
http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/4e98e721ac364714b7ast03vuc
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>