CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?

To: CQ Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?
From: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:54:08 -0600
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
There used to be a thing called "rule of law." Some places and some
countries still have it. It was pointed out to me that in the recent
disaster in Japan, there was virtually NO looting. Would that happen
in a similar situation in the USA?

I don't know why the rule of law went out the window, but it seems in
society at large it's gone. Ham radio is just a small example of the
whole.

73, Zack W9SZ


On 3/19/11, somata90924@mypacks.net <somata90924@mypacks.net> wrote:
> if people would be HONEST WE WOULD not have to be bothered by all
> this,,skimmers,,internet, cheaters, SPOTS,,,,,bahhhhhh humbug.  Guess we
> have lost that as a society, ever watch how many people never STOP at a STOP
> SIGN?
>
> joe w6vnr/zf2ah
>
> -----Original Message-----
>>From: burbidge terence <terryburbidge@blueyonder.co.uk>
>>Sent: Mar 18, 2011 7:21 AM
>>To: cq-contest@contesting.com
>>Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Technology against cheating?
>>
>><<I would describe recordings, whether of a whole
>>band or from individual stations, as technology
>>which inherently inhibits cheating, in contrast
>>to some other technologies which facilitate
>>cheating.>>
>>Great idea. Perhaps we could employ a firm of forensic experts to replay
>> and
>>report on the recordings? Even simpler, let's set up a 'Star Chamber' of
>>distinguished contesters to investigate. Not just cheating but also
>>behaviour. For example, start/stop the clock when an SO2R/VFO leaves his
>> run
>>frequency to make Q elsewhere and someone like me jumps in and steals it.
>>
>>Maybe take the Star Chamber findings to the International Court, complete
>>with the 'usual suspects' who could then be interrogated and eventually
>>tried for their offences.
>>
>>For goodness sake!
>>
>>Cheers,
>>
>>Terry
>>G4MKP
>>_______________________________________________
>>CQ-Contest mailing list
>>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>