Paul, So now spotting gives WRTC points? Nope. Then why the No. 1 spotted
team R36F dropped to place 26? Your logic makes no sense.
Hk3CW Rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul O'Kane" <pokane@ei5di.com>
To: "CQ CONTEST" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] List of WRTC stations /
Results/Overspottinganditsimpact
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Radio K0HB" <kzerohb@gmail.com>
>
>> There was no impact, Rob. LU5DX has decided to create
>> a controversy where none exists,
>
> No impact - where the number of spots for each team
> varied from 1 to 121? Of course there was an impact.
> Look at the results. A single additional spot for
> ES5TV/ES2RR could have made them winners. One fewer
> spot for RW1AC/RA1AIP could have dropped them to
> second place.
>
> Spotting is the most significant unregulated factor in
> preventing WRTC being a true measure of the operating
> skills of each team.
>
> Can it be regulated? If not, we will have the same
> controversy next time.
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|